The property listing could not answer where the system was drawn.
The public property information did not supply the tank and drain-field positions. Knowing that a home is described as using septic is different from having its layout.
We assembled the property identifiers for a focused TDEC request. We asked for the permit, layout, final approval and repair records rather than treating an empty public search as proof that no record existed.
TDEC returned a historical construction permit and sketch. We separated the written system specifications from the drawing, then delivered the unmodified agency file alongside a two-page explanation. The numbers below describe this returned historical record, not a new measurement of the property.
The answer: a three-bedroom design, a 900-gallon tank, and three field lines labeled 60, 80 and 85 feet—225 linear feet in total. The sketch places the tank beside the house and shows the field-line arrangement. That gave the customer a documented starting point that the listing had not supplied.
The unresolved part: the sketch has no north arrow and is not a scaled survey. It does not establish the exact present-day position, later changes, or working condition. We did not turn a recovered historical layout into a claim that the system had been located on site.
This was a completed records delivery, not a completed site inspection. Source basis: saved customer request, TDEC return, historical permit and customer delivery. Personal identifiers are omitted; the displayed excerpt is the existing public crop.
